Who fixed indexed annuities are NOT for
Fixed indexed annuities are the wrong choice for a lot of people, including some of the people they get pitched to hardest. If you may need the money soon, want maximum growth, would be committing most of your savings, are years from retirement, or don't fully understand the contract, an FIA is probably not your answer. Here is each of those, plainly.
1. You may need this money within the next several years
Most FIA contracts charge surrender fees on withdrawals beyond an allowed amount (commonly around 10% per year) for the first 7 to 10 years. If there's a real chance you'll need more than that for a roof, a health event, or helping family, committing that money to an FIA turns a normal life event into an expensive one. Money you might need stays somewhere you can reach it.
2. You want maximum long-term growth and can stomach the ride
The floor of zero is paid for with caps and participation limits: that trade is the whole product. If you're comfortable riding out downturns and your timeline is long, staying invested in the market has historically offered more growth than any capped contract, in exchange for real down years. An FIA is not a way to beat the market. It's a way to opt out of part of it. Those are different goals, and only you know which one you hold.
3. You'd be putting most or all of your savings into it
Even when an FIA fits, it fits as a portion: the part of your savings whose job is stability, not the whole pot. Concentrating everything in one contract, one company, one product category is rarely wise, and an agent who suggests moving everything you have into one should worry you. That applies to me too. Part of what a real review does is talk about which slice of your savings, if any, this kind of contract suits.
4. Retirement is still decades away
The floor matters most when a market drop would change near-term plans. At 35 or 45, time is usually the better protection. Downturns have room to recover before you need the money. These contracts are built around the years close to and inside retirement. That's not a rule about age; it's a rule about when the money has to show up for work.
5. You don't fully understand what you'd be signing
Caps, participation rates, spreads, riders, renewal terms, surrender schedules: these contracts have real moving parts. If an explanation left you more confused than before, or you felt rushed past the details, do not sign. Not with me, not with anyone. The three questions that separate the pros from the pitches are a decent test of whoever is across the table.
Why an agent would publish this list
Because the alternative is worse for both of us. If an FIA is wrong for you and you buy one anyway, you end up unhappy, and you should. I would rather tell you it's not a fit in thirty minutes than have you find out in year three. Some people who take the checkup get exactly that answer, and it's a useful answer to have.
The full plain-English explainer (mechanics, tradeoffs, and who it's wrong for) is here: how fixed indexed annuities actually work.
Transcript
I'm a licensed insurance agent. Fixed indexed annuities are part of what I work with, and this video is the list of people who should not buy one, including some of the people these products get pitched to hardest. If you're on the list, an FIA is probably not your answer, and you deserve to hear that from an agent before you hear it from experience.
I'm Eric Lenhardt. If someone ever chooses a contract through me, the insurance company pays me a commission. You should know that going in because it makes a list like this one worth double-checking against your own judgment.
The question this video answers: in what situation is a fixed indexed annuity simply the wrong choice?
Most of these contracts charge surrender fees on withdrawals beyond an allowed amount, commonly around 10% per year for the first seven to 10 years. So if there's a real chance you need a bigger piece of that money for a roof, a health event, or helping family, committing it to an FIA turns a normal life event into an expensive one. Money you might need soon belongs somewhere you can reach it. Full stop.
The floor of zero is paid for with caps and participation limits. I made a whole video on that trade. It's linked below. If your timeline is long and you're comfortable riding out downturns, staying invested in the market has historically offered more growth than any capped contract in exchange for real down years along the way. An FIA is not a way to beat the market. It's a way to opt out of part of it. Those are different goals, and only you know which one is yours.
Even when one of these contracts fits, it fits as a portion. The slice of your savings whose job is stability, not the whole pot. Concentrating everything you have in one contract with one company and one product category is rarely wise, and an agent who suggests moving everything you have into one, you should worry about. That applies to me, too.
The floor matters most when a market drop would change your near-term plans. At thirty-five or forty-five, time itself is usually the better protection because downturns have room to recover before the money has to show up for work. These contracts are built around the years close to and inside retirement. That's not really a rule about your age. It's a rule about when the money goes to work.
Caps, participation rates, spreads, riders, renewal terms, surrender schedules. These contracts have real moving parts. If an explanation left you more confused than when it started, or you felt rushed past the details, do not sign. Not with me, not with anyone.
So why should someone who sells these products make this video? Well, because the alternative is worse for both of us. If an FIA is wrong for you and you buy one anyway, you end up unhappy. I would rather tell you it's not a fit in thirty minutes than have you find out in year three. Some people who take my checkup get exactly that answer. It's a useful answer to have.
The one-sentence version: If you may need the money soon, want maximum growth, would be committing most of your savings or decades from retirement, or don't fully understand the contract, a fixed indexed annuity is probably not your answer. The written version of this list is on my site, linked below. And if you're not sure which side of the list you're on, the free checkup takes about two minutes and gives you a straight answer, including, "This isn't for you," when that's the truth.
Start your free checkup
Not sure which side of this list you're on? The free 1-minute checkup gives you a personalized read and a straight answer, including "this isn't for you," when that's the truth.
Start my free checkup